The Member of Parliament for Suame, John Darko, has described the removal of Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo as a politically motivated process, insisting that the outcome was predetermined from the very beginning.
Speaking in reaction to recent developments surrounding the Chief Justice’s removal, the lawmaker argued that the proceedings were driven more by political considerations than by an objective pursuit of justice. According to him, the circumstances leading to the decision have reinforced concerns about political interference in Ghana’s judiciary.
Mr. Darko maintained that the process has significant implications for the country’s democratic institutions, warning that actions perceived as politically influenced could undermine public confidence in the independence of the judiciary.
He further called on Ghanaians to remain vigilant in defending the rule of law and safeguarding the integrity of constitutional bodies. The Suame MP stressed that the judiciary must be allowed to operate free from political pressure if it is to maintain the trust of the public.
His comments add to the growing national debate over the removal of Justice Gertrude Torkornoo, with political parties, legal practitioners, and civil society groups expressing differing opinions on the matter. While supporters of the process insist that constitutional procedures were followed, critics continue to question the motivations behind the move.
The issue is expected to remain a major subject of political and legal discussion in the coming weeks as stakeholders continue to assess its implications for Ghana’s democracy and judicial independence.
source
